<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ZX of Cricket</title>
    <link>http://www.saumilzx.com</link>
    <description>Tendulkar Chennai 1st Test Inda v England 2008</description>
    <generator>Feeder 1.5.7(628) http://reinventedsoftware.com/feeder/</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:00:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://www.saumilzx.com/cricket.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <itunes:author>saumilzx</itunes:author>
    <itunes:keywords>Cricket, Tendulkar, Dot Chess</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="http://www.saumilzx.com/cricket/saumilzxiconDotChessCover.jpg"/>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Saumil Bhukhanwala</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>info@saumilzx.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
    <itunes:category text="Sports &amp; Recreation">
      <itunes:category text="Professional"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>Batting Order or Disorder?</title>
      <link>http://saumilzx.blogspot.com/2009/05/mumbai-allocate-resources-for-luck.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The IPL 2009 has star studded batting line-ups. However, the 20 over format has created headaches for teams such Mumbai Indians, and today the Chargers who lost because some of the big hitters did not get in early enough.</p>

<p>In such a case, as mentioned in my blogs earlier, in T20s their is danger that a batting side may not play itself in. So the question to be tracked is, should we look at batting line-ups as an order or should we be prepared to disorder it. It is a tough one, since batting is sequenced, and batters can only come in at the fall of a wicket, whereas bowlers- although not simulataneous in participation- can be shuffled around. (explained in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/8175258241?ie=UTF8&tag=httpwwwsaumil-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=8175258241">Dot Chess</a>)</p>

<p><a href="http://saumilzx.blogspot.com/2009/05/mumbai-allocate-resources-for-luck.html">saumilzx at blogspot</a>
<br />May 13, 2009</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:59:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">batting-order-or-disorder</guid>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IPL Cricket T20, 2009</title>
      <link>http://saumilzx.blogspot.com/search/label/IPL%202009%20Indian%20Cricket%20T20</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This IPL T20 in South Africa seems interesting, since most teams have had to work hard for even maintaining a run-a-ball strike rate on account of sluggish pitches (quite unlike South Africa for outsiders). Batting sides have had to mix caution and aggression, and it is usually not too easy to just assume that big shots will be a natural outcome, if wickets are in hand.</p>

<p>In ODIs (50 overs), it is often the case that a side may be in danger of getting all out before the stipulated quota of overs. In T20, this may happen as well, albeit rarely. But the bigger danger in T20 is that a batting side may not play itself in!</p>

<p>Track why Mumbai Indians have the highest net run rate (which means over for over, they are doing great) but are struggling to hang in to secure a place in the semi finals. They just did not get their doze of flukes and lucky shots earlier in their tournament, and have been clinical in chases, without the big shots.</p>

<p><a href="http://saumilzx.blogspot.com/search/label/IPL%202009%20Indian%20Cricket%20T20">track saumilzx at blogspot</a></p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:26:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ipl-cricket-t20-2009</guid>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ZX of Cricket - Now Enhanced for 2009!</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>ZX of Cricket is now at 
<br />http://www.saumilzx.com/cricket.xml</p>

<p>We will be using libsyn podcast hosting for this podcast. The migration is complete. The intial podcasts of Dec 2008 will still be available and so are the blogs
<br />http://saumilzx.blogspot.com.</p>

<p>Will have more on SA/Aus series and also on Indian Cricket this year
<br />Happy New Year
<br />saumilzx
<br />1/1/2009</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:31:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">zx-of-cricket-migrates-media-to-libsyncom</guid>
      <itunes:author>saumilzx</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Views on Kevin Pietersen&apos;s switch-shot</title>
      <link>http://saumilzx.blogspot.com/2008/12/views-on-kevin-pietersens-switch-shot.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[What if a right-handed batsman takes guard as a left-handed batsman and decides to switch to play a right-handed shot?]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:52:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/saumilzx/Views_on_Kevin_Pietersens_switch-shot.mp3" length="2222221" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">views-on-kevin-pietersens-switchshot</guid>
      <itunes:author>saumilzx</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tendulkar in Chennai, 2008</title>
      <link>http://saumilzx.blogspot.com/2008/12/finally-tendulkar-let-us-down-1st-test.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Finally, Tendulkar let India down! Chennai- 1st Test v England 2008]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:42:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/saumilzx/Tendulkar_in_Chennai_2008.mp3" length="5705442" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tendulkar-in-chennai-2008</guid>
      <itunes:author>saumilzx</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>